The efficacy of fully AI-generated lectures

  • Tim Lisette Willaert

    Student thesis: Master's Thesis

    Abstract

    This thesis explores the efficacy and usability of fully AI-generated lectures. With the
    recent advancements in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) technologies, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, there has been a large shift in how
    information can be easily accessed, generated, and utilized. This research focuses on
    leveraging these advancements to create a tool that automatically generates complete
    lectures, encompassing the entire process from structure outlining and scriptwriting to
    slide creation and delivery via a digital avatar.
    The motivation behind this study comes from the challenges faced in the educational
    sector, including the time-consuming nature of lecture preparation and the potentially
    static nature of reused lectures. By integrating LLMs and other GenAI technologies
    such as image, video, and speech synthesis, the proposed solution aims to provide a
    dynamic and adaptable teaching tool that may speed up the lecture creation process
    and keeps content up-to-date.
    To evaluate the usability and effectiveness of the tool, a user study was conducted
    with 12 experienced educators from various fields and educational levels. The study
    revealed that the prototype achieved a mean System Usability Scale (SUS) score of
    80,42, indicating a good level of usability. It was found that the tool increased workflow
    efficiency, with most participants agreeing that it made lecture creation faster and more
    streamlined. Most participants said they would integrate this tool into their workflow,
    but only a few believed it would improve the quality of their lectures.
    Overall, this research demonstrates the practical applications of GenAI technologies
    in an educational context. While the prototype shows promise in increasing educators’
    productivity and streamlining the lecture creation process, it also highlights the need
    for expert oversight to make sure the content is accurate and qualitative. Future work
    may focus on addressing the identified limitations and further refining the tool to better
    meet the needs of educators.
    Date of Award2024
    Original languageEnglish (American)
    SupervisorAndreas Stöckl (Supervisor)

    Cite this

    '