Web Site Analysis: A Review and Assessment of Previous Research

Horst Treiblmaier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


The emergence of the World Wide Web as a major communication and trans-action channel stresses the preeminent importance of a company's Web site for representing the organization, interacting with customers and conducting transactions. In comparison to other channels, the opportunities for targeting specific market segments are somehow limited, due to the Internet's world-wide reach and predominantly anonymous users. Additionally, an ever in-creasing number of customers are going online, which prevents the fi-ne tuning of a site for specific user groups. Therefore it seems essential that organizations possessing a Web presence should be well aware of their site's general functionality and how it is perceived by Internet users. For many years the analysis of Web sites has been one of the major topics for both scholars and practitioners, which led to a huge number of different techniques being used for the evaluation of sites. Furthermore, a variety of different theories and models have been developed which include the effects of Web sites as dependent or independent variables. In this paper, I compare different approaches to Web site analysis and present a classification framework. Numerous examples will be given to illustrate the various dimensions of the framework. Furthermore, benefits and drawbacks of the respective methods will be discussed where applicable. The results provide important insights into the current state of the art of Web analysis and will be supportive for anyone planning to conduct a Web analysis as well as for someone who is interested in getting an overview of the research field.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)806-843
JournalCommunications of the Association for Information Systems
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2007


  • Web analysis
  • Web sites
  • Web Evaluation
  • Metrics


Dive into the research topics of 'Web Site Analysis: A Review and Assessment of Previous Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this