Abstract
Objective: The goal of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of some widely used, easily administered clinical tests. Background: Simple tests of oculomotor function have become widely used for clinical screening of patients suspected of having vestibular disorders despite a paucity of evidence showing good statistical support for their use in this highly variable population. Methods: Healthy controls with no history of otologic or neurologic disorders (n = 291) were compared to patients with known vestibular disorders (n = 62). All subjects performed passive and active head shaking, un-instrumented head impulse tests (HT), and video head impulse tests (vHIT) recorded with infrared video-oculography. Results: For both passive and active head shaking, using presence/absence of vertigo and of nystagmus, sensitivity was low (<0.40). Sensitivity of presence/absence of saccades on HT was even lower (<0.15). On vHIT, gains were all approximately = 1.0, so sensitivity was very low (approximately 0.15–0.35). Sensitivity and specificity for presence/absence of saccades were moderately poor (less than 0.70). Conclusion: None of these tests are adequate for screening patients in the out-patient clinic for vestibular disorders or for screening people in epidemiologic studies to determine the prevalence of vestibular disorders.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 382-386 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Acta Oto-Laryngologica |
Volume | 138 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 3 Apr 2018 |
Keywords
- head impulse test
- head shaking
- infra-red video-oculography
- Vestibulo-ocular reflex
- video head impulse test
- Head Impulse Test
- Humans
- Middle Aged
- Male
- Case-Control Studies
- Young Adult
- Mass Screening
- Sensitivity and Specificity
- Aged, 80 and over
- Adult
- Female
- Aged
- Vestibular Function Tests
- Vestibular Diseases/diagnosis