The effects of marketer- and advocate-initiated online service recovery responses on silent bystanders

Wolfgang Weitzl, Clemens Hutzinger

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    37 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Dissatisfied customers increasingly voice their complaints on social media. These negative comments and subsequent responses are an important information source for potential customers. In a consumer-empowered era, these responses not only originate from marketers, but are often articulated by engaged brand advocates. In this study we investigate the effect of both marketers’ and advocates’ responses to service failures on bystanders’ favorable and unfavorable brand-related reactions. Specifically, two scenario-based experiments (n1 = 731; n2 = 361) were conducted in which specific webcare response types and sources were systematically manipulated. Results show that companies are particularly effective in enhancing bystander-brand relationships by means of credible and accommodative responses and sometimes even with credible, defensive responses. Most importantly, however, brand advocates can help the company to increase favorable brand-related outcomes with accommodative responses and mitigate unfavorable outcomes with web-specific defensive responses.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)164-175
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of Business Research
    Volume80
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

    Keywords

    • Brand advocate
    • Negative word-of-mouth
    • Online complaints
    • Service failure
    • Service recovery
    • Webcare

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of marketer- and advocate-initiated online service recovery responses on silent bystanders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this