TY - GEN
T1 - Simulation Based Forecast Data Generation and Evaluation of Forecast Error Measures
AU - Zeiml, Sarah
AU - Altendorfer, Klaus
AU - Felberbauer, Thomas
AU - Nurgazina, Jamilya
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 IEEE.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/12
Y1 - 2019/12
N2 - Production planning is usually performed based on customer orders or demand forecasts. The demand forecasts in production systems can either be generated by manufacturing companies themselves, i.e. forecast prediction, or they can be provided by customers. For both alternatives, forecast prediction, as well as the customer-provided forecasts, the quality of those forecasts is critical for success. In this paper, a simulation model to generate forecast data that mimic different forecast behaviors is presented. In detail, an independent forecast distribution and a forecast evolution model are investigated to discuss the value of customer-provided forecasts in comparison to the simple moving average forecast prediction method. Main findings of the paper are that Root-Mean-Square-Error and Mean-Absolute-Percentage-Error describe the forecast error well if no systematic effects are present and Mean-Percentage-Error provides a good measure for systematic effects. Furthermore, systematic effects like overbooking are significantly reducing the value of customer-provided forecast information.
AB - Production planning is usually performed based on customer orders or demand forecasts. The demand forecasts in production systems can either be generated by manufacturing companies themselves, i.e. forecast prediction, or they can be provided by customers. For both alternatives, forecast prediction, as well as the customer-provided forecasts, the quality of those forecasts is critical for success. In this paper, a simulation model to generate forecast data that mimic different forecast behaviors is presented. In detail, an independent forecast distribution and a forecast evolution model are investigated to discuss the value of customer-provided forecasts in comparison to the simple moving average forecast prediction method. Main findings of the paper are that Root-Mean-Square-Error and Mean-Absolute-Percentage-Error describe the forecast error well if no systematic effects are present and Mean-Percentage-Error provides a good measure for systematic effects. Furthermore, systematic effects like overbooking are significantly reducing the value of customer-provided forecast information.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081118439&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/WSC40007.2019.9004876
DO - 10.1109/WSC40007.2019.9004876
M3 - Conference contribution
T3 - Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference
SP - 2119
EP - 2130
BT - 2019 Winter Simulation Conference, WSC 2019
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2019 Winter Simulation Conference, WSC 2019
Y2 - 8 December 2019 through 11 December 2019
ER -