TY - JOUR
T1 - Methodological and tool-based decision support framework for a sustainable end-of-life management of products
AU - Diallo, Thierno M.L.
AU - Merschak, Simon
AU - Hammadi, Moncef
AU - Hehenberger, Peter
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The pursuit of a Circular Economy (CE) has gained prominence among policymakers and society, driven by the urgent need to reduce environmental degradation and resource depletion. The CE places emphasis on the end-of-life (EOL) phase of products and the choice of management strategies, which range from non-circular options such as landfilling to more circular approaches including reuse, recycling, and recovery. This paper proposes a methodological framework, supported by practical tools, to guide the selection of EOL strategies that extend beyond circularity to embrace a holistic approach to sustainability. The framework consists of four stages, each accompanied by appropriate tools, and assesses options across the entire product lifecycle, taking into account the three dimensions of sustainability: environmental, economic, and social. Applied to a case study involving laundry detergent packaging, the framework revealed that, in certain cases, strategies with lower levels of circularity can lead to better sustainability outcomes than more circular alternatives. These findings challenge the commonly held belief that higher circularity inherently represents the best choice. By integrating life cycle thinking and a multidimensional assessment that considers the three pillars of sustainability—environmental, economic, and social—this research highlights the importance of rigorous, context-sensitive analysis in end-of-life decision-making. The proposed framework offers a practical and adaptable tool for stakeholders seeking to implement sustainable EOL strategies in line with CE principles.
AB - The pursuit of a Circular Economy (CE) has gained prominence among policymakers and society, driven by the urgent need to reduce environmental degradation and resource depletion. The CE places emphasis on the end-of-life (EOL) phase of products and the choice of management strategies, which range from non-circular options such as landfilling to more circular approaches including reuse, recycling, and recovery. This paper proposes a methodological framework, supported by practical tools, to guide the selection of EOL strategies that extend beyond circularity to embrace a holistic approach to sustainability. The framework consists of four stages, each accompanied by appropriate tools, and assesses options across the entire product lifecycle, taking into account the three dimensions of sustainability: environmental, economic, and social. Applied to a case study involving laundry detergent packaging, the framework revealed that, in certain cases, strategies with lower levels of circularity can lead to better sustainability outcomes than more circular alternatives. These findings challenge the commonly held belief that higher circularity inherently represents the best choice. By integrating life cycle thinking and a multidimensional assessment that considers the three pillars of sustainability—environmental, economic, and social—this research highlights the importance of rigorous, context-sensitive analysis in end-of-life decision-making. The proposed framework offers a practical and adaptable tool for stakeholders seeking to implement sustainable EOL strategies in line with CE principles.
KW - End-of-life management
KW - Sustainability
KW - Decision-making
KW - Compatibility analysis
KW - Circular economy
KW - Circular economy
KW - Compatibility analysis
KW - Decision-making
KW - End-of-life management
KW - Sustainability
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105023569547
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.147137
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.147137
M3 - Article
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 536
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
M1 - 147137
ER -