Is the Technostress Creators Inventory Still an Up-To-Date Measurement Instrument? Results of a Large-Scale Interview Study

Thomas Fischer, Alexander Pehböck, René Riedl

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingsConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Self-report measures are of great importance for technostress research and particularly the Technostress Creators Inventory has been amongst the most frequently applied measurement instruments since its inception in 2008. As the technological environment has progressed since then, we investigated whether this inventory still completely represents the phenomenon of technostress today. We conducted interviews with 75 individuals in four companies on their technostress experiences. We asked them about their personal experiences with eight stressor categories in the workplace, the original five dimensions of the Technostress Creators Inventory (techno-overload, techno-invasion, techno-complexity, techno-insecurity, and techno-uncertainty) and additional three categories (techno-unreliability, IT-based monitoring, and cyberbullying). We found that techno-insecurity was the least prevalent stressor category throughout all companies, while techno-unreliability, one of our new categories, was the most prevalent stressor. Based on this evidence, we argue that a revised inventory is urgently needed to guarantee content validity of technostress measurement in future studies.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTagungsband der 14. Internationalen Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik
Pages1834-1845
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Event14. Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik - Siegen, Germany
Duration: 23 Feb 201927 Feb 2019
https://wi2019.de/

Conference

Conference14. Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik
Country/TerritoryGermany
CitySiegen
Period23.02.201927.02.2019
Internet address

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is the Technostress Creators Inventory Still an Up-To-Date Measurement Instrument? Results of a Large-Scale Interview Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this