Abstract
Teachers' ( N = 625; 74% female) use of intervention strategies was examined in a hypothetical bullying episode. Self-reported strategies were best described by a five-factor structure. Teachers preferred authority-based interventions, followed by non-punitive work with bullies and involvement of other adults. They were less likely to work with victims or ignore the incident. About 60% of teachers would apply authority-based interventions toward bullies without working with victims at the same time, while 3% would work with victims without using authority-based interventions toward bullies. Strategy use was moderated by teachers' gender and teaching experience. Implications for bullying prevention and teacher education are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 191-202 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Teaching and Teacher Education |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Anti-bullying intervention
- Bullying
- Configural frequency analysis
- Handling bullying questionnaire (HBQ)
- Intervention strategies
- School violence
- Teacher response
- Victimization
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How teachers respond to school bullying: An examination of self-reported intervention strategy use, moderator effects, and concurrent use of multiple strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver