With the increasing importance attached to new public management, administrative parts of university organisations have experienced rising attention. Academics fear that administrative managers may take over control and constrict academic freedom. Yet, it is not clear how administrative middle managers perceive their role themselves. The relationship between administrative middle management and academics is bound to be challenging and conflict prone (Krücken et al 2013). Following this stream of argumentation, this paper elaborates on the possibilities to align and harmonise discrepancies as well as conflicting and diverse demands resulting from tensions between academic and commercial mind-sets. By doing so, the authors focus on an administrative point of view drawing from the concept of organisational ambidexterity (Tushman & O’Reilly 1996). Accordingly, the integration of both systems and their learning modes (exploration vs. exploitation) is essential to ensure long-term organisational success and survival (Güttel, Konlechner 2009, p. 151; Simsek 2009, p. 597; Tahar et al. 2011, p. 304).
|Title of host publication||28th CHER Annual Conference|
|Number of pages||11|
|Publication status||Published - 2015|
|Event||CHER - Lisbon , Portugal|
Duration: 7 Sep 2015 → 9 Sep 2015
|Period||07.09.2015 → 09.09.2015|