Evaluating variable selection methods for diagnosis of myocardial infarction.

S. Dreiseitl, L. Ohno-Machado, S. Vinterbo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper evaluates the variable selection performed by several machine-learning techniques on a myocardial infarction data set. The focus of this work is to determine which of 43 input variables are considered relevant for prediction of myocardial infarction. The algorithms investigated were logistic regression (with stepwise, forward, and backward selection), backpropagation for multilayer perceptrons (input relevance determination), Bayesian neural networks (automatic relevance determination), and rough sets. An independent method (self-organizing maps) was then used to evaluate and visualize the different subsets of predictor variables. Results show good agreement on some predictors, but also variability among different methods; only one variable was selected by all models.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)246-250
Number of pages5
JournalProceedings / AMIA ... Annual Symposium. AMIA Symposium
Publication statusPublished - 1999
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Algorithms
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Chest Pain/etiology
  • Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Mathematics
  • Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis
  • Neural Networks, Computer

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating variable selection methods for diagnosis of myocardial infarction.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this