Comparing Social Interactions in Metaverse and Video Conferencing: Preliminary Insights of a Laboratory Experiment

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractpeer-review

Abstract

Collaboration between team members increasingly occurs online, where digital technologies enable individuals to share their thoughts and ideas to make joint decisions. The metaverse is often regarded as one of the most promising ways to facilitate such decisions. In this research, we empirically compare teamwork in the metaverse with online collaboration in a 2D computer-mediated environment (i.e., Microsoft Teams). The aim of this research is to replicate the findings of Hennig-Thurau et al.’s (2022) field experiments and extend them by shedding light on the role of additional explanatory variables (e.g., flow, information overload) and outcomes. Preliminary results of our lab experiment show that concerning the perceived collaboration outcomes (e.g., satisfaction with task outcomes, satisfaction with the task process, perceived creativity, positive/negative emotions), no significant difference between the two collaboration types (3D vs. 2D) could be found. However, our current research status suggests that the two digital channels affect individuals differently in terms of the perceived exhaustion (i.e., stress). Overall, the first findings imply that value creation in the metaverse – at least for a creative team task – can be problematic.
Original languageEnglish
Pages19
Number of pages21
Publication statusPublished - 2023
Event5th International AIRSI Conference: The Metaverse Conference - Virtuell
Duration: 15 May 202317 May 2023
https://airsi.unizar.es/

Conference

Conference5th International AIRSI Conference
CityVirtuell
Period15.05.202317.05.2023
Internet address

Keywords

  • Digital collaboration
  • Metaverse
  • Video conferencing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing Social Interactions in Metaverse and Video Conferencing: Preliminary Insights of a Laboratory Experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this