Abschreckung und Peer-Delinquenz – Interaktive Beziehungsdynamiken am Beispiel der Ladendiebstahlsdelinquenz junger Menschen

Helmut Hirtenlehner, Johann Bacher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The present article studies the interplay of exposure to delinquent peers and perceived sanction risk with regard to the formation of adolescent shoplifting delinquency. Two rival hypotheses are investigated. Situational Action Theory suggests that adolescents who have many delinquent friends are more responsive to perceived sanction risk, simply because they are more often exposed to a crime-encouraging moral context, which causes them to regard crime more frequently as a real action alternative. From Rational Choice Theory it is derived that adolescents who have few or no delinquent friends are more vulnerable to perceived sanction risk, simply because these individuals have more social costs following from criminal punishment to fear. Results from a large-scale cross-sectional shoplifting survey among Austrian adolescents provide more support for the interaction proposed by Situational Action Theory. Peer delinquency conditions the significance of perceived sanction risk, and sanction certainty perceptions are most predictive of personal shoplifting frequency among adolescents with high levels of delinquent peer association. These findings hold for both perceptual and peer-reported measures of friends' shoplifting delinquency.

Translated title of the contributionAbschreckung und Peer-Delinquenz – Interaktive Beziehungsdynamiken am Beispiel der Ladendiebstahlsdelinquenz junger Menschen
Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)403-429
Number of pages27
JournalMonatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform
Volume100
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Abschreckung und Peer-Delinquenz – Interaktive Beziehungsdynamiken am Beispiel der Ladendiebstahlsdelinquenz junger Menschen'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this