Abstract
This study examines how consumers from individualistic and collectivistic consumer markets form recovery expectations and loyalty intentions in response to service recovery promises and bystander comments on social media. Across two experiments, we find that complainants’ origin fundamentally shapes how they interpret recovery efforts. Individualistic consumers exposed to non-accommodative recovery promises respond more favorably when accompanied by positive consumer comments. In contrast, collectivistic consumers report higher recovery expectations and intentions when the same promises are paired with negative comments. Importantly, bystander comments exert greater influence when companies issue non-accommodative rather than accommodative responses across both markets. This research is the first to reveal that complainant origin (culture) and bystander presence jointly moderate the effects of recovery communications. The findings challenge uniform global customer behavior assumptions and offer actionable insights for managing service failures in global markets. The study advances online service recovery theory.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Fachzeitschrift | Electronic Commerce Research |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 2026 |
UN SDGs
Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung
-
SDG 12 – Verantwortungsvoller Konsum und Produktion
Schlagwörter
- online complaints
- service recovery
- recovery promises
- webcare
- cultural orientation
- interactive virtual presence
- virtual presence
- social presence
- social influence
- international marketing
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „When service recovery promises meet bystander comments: a cross-cultural study of complaint responses“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver