TY - JOUR
T1 - Utilizing digital elevation models for camera-trap distance estimation
AU - Böss, Leopold
AU - Wohlfahrt, Stephanie
AU - Schedl, David C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Copyright for this paper by its authors.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Camera traps have become a norm for estimating wildlife populations utilizing random encounter models to express metrics such as abundance and density. One essential parameter required to evaluate such models is the speed of the trapped animal. This speed can be estimated by labeling the contact point of instances with the ground across image sequences and projecting the resulting pixels onto a model describing said ground. Our approach proposes using digital elevation models recorded via airborne laser scanning as an alternative to manually calibrating simpler ground models. A study to investigate the impact of DEMs’ level of complexity on the accuracy of projected pixel distance estimates was conducted using a realistic dataset of 2629 2D labels and DEMs of three different resolutions. Reducing the resolution of the used DEM from 3 m to 20 m and 50 m leads to an average skew in distances of 2.84 m and 3.94 m, respectively, with widely dispersed individual errors. Further work is needed to assess the impact of these errors on speed and wildlife density calculations. Despite these challenges, the method shows promise as an alternative to currently used methods.
AB - Camera traps have become a norm for estimating wildlife populations utilizing random encounter models to express metrics such as abundance and density. One essential parameter required to evaluate such models is the speed of the trapped animal. This speed can be estimated by labeling the contact point of instances with the ground across image sequences and projecting the resulting pixels onto a model describing said ground. Our approach proposes using digital elevation models recorded via airborne laser scanning as an alternative to manually calibrating simpler ground models. A study to investigate the impact of DEMs’ level of complexity on the accuracy of projected pixel distance estimates was conducted using a realistic dataset of 2629 2D labels and DEMs of three different resolutions. Reducing the resolution of the used DEM from 3 m to 20 m and 50 m leads to an average skew in distances of 2.84 m and 3.94 m, respectively, with widely dispersed individual errors. Further work is needed to assess the impact of these errors on speed and wildlife density calculations. Despite these challenges, the method shows promise as an alternative to currently used methods.
KW - biodiversity monitoring
KW - camera traps
KW - elevation models
KW - geospatial techniques
KW - wildlife density estimation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85207502388&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85207502388
SN - 1613-0073
VL - 3786
SP - 15
EP - 21
JO - CEUR Workshop Proceedings
JF - CEUR Workshop Proceedings
T2 - 4th International Workshop on Camera Traps, AI, and Ecology, CamTraps 2024
Y2 - 5 September 2024 through 6 September 2024
ER -