Abstract
Every day, millions of consumers observe online complaints and adapt their purchase-related intentions accordingly. This work sheds light on the role of (a) social closeness to the complainant and (b) reaction time of the recovering company on observing consumers’ in-clination to spread negative and positive word-of-mouth (PWOM and NWOM). We ran a 2 (social closeness: close vs. distant) x 2 (reaction time: immediate vs. delayed) between-subjects online experiment with participants observing an online complaint about a COVID-19 related service failure at a fictitious hotel. The results showed that observers show higher NWOM if they perceive high – as compared to low – closeness towards the complaining person as well as if the company has a delayed – as compared to an immediate – reaction. However, these effects do not occur for PWOM. Implications for theory and practice on the diversity of PWOM vs. NWOM are discussed.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Titel | Proceedings of the 2021 ANZMAC Annual Conference |
| Erscheinungsort | Melbourne |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 2021 |
| Veranstaltung | ANZMAC 2021 - University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australien Dauer: 29 Nov. 2021 → 1 Dez. 2021 https://www.anzmac2021.com/ |
Konferenz
| Konferenz | ANZMAC 2021 |
|---|---|
| Land/Gebiet | Australien |
| Ort | Melbourne |
| Zeitraum | 29.11.2021 → 01.12.2021 |
| Internetadresse |
Schlagwörter
- Online complaining
- Word-of-mouth
- Social closeness
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Triggering Word-of-Mouth with Social Closeness and Complaint-Reaction-Time?!“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver