Triggering Word-of-Mouth with Social Closeness and Complaint-Reaction-Time?!

Clemens Hutzinger, Wolfgang Jonas Weitzl

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/TagungsbandKonferenzbeitragBegutachtung

Abstract

Every day, millions of consumers observe online complaints and adapt their purchase-related intentions accordingly. This work sheds light on the role of (a) social closeness to the complainant and (b) reaction time of the recovering company on observing consumers’ in-clination to spread negative and positive word-of-mouth (PWOM and NWOM). We ran a 2 (social closeness: close vs. distant) x 2 (reaction time: immediate vs. delayed) between-subjects online experiment with participants observing an online complaint about a COVID-19 related service failure at a fictitious hotel. The results showed that observers show higher NWOM if they perceive high – as compared to low – closeness towards the complaining person as well as if the company has a delayed – as compared to an immediate – reaction. However, these effects do not occur for PWOM. Implications for theory and practice on the diversity of PWOM vs. NWOM are discussed.
OriginalspracheEnglisch
TitelProceedings of the 2021 ANZMAC Annual Conference
ErscheinungsortMelbourne
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2021
VeranstaltungANZMAC 2021 - University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australien
Dauer: 29 Nov. 20211 Dez. 2021
https://www.anzmac2021.com/

Konferenz

KonferenzANZMAC 2021
Land/GebietAustralien
OrtMelbourne
Zeitraum29.11.202101.12.2021
Internetadresse

Schlagwörter

  • Online complaining
  • Word-of-mouth
  • Social closeness

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Triggering Word-of-Mouth with Social Closeness and Complaint-Reaction-Time?!“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Zitieren