TY - CONF
T1 - Remote Persons Are Closer Than They Appear: Home, Team and a Lockdown
AU - Augstein, Mirjam
AU - Neumayr, Thomas
AU - Schönböck, Johannes
AU - Kovacs, Carrie
N1 - Funding Information:
The work reported in this article has mainly been conducted within the scope of the Hybrid Collaboration Spaces (HYCOS) project, funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 34928]. The underlying data was collected during the Supporting Hybrid Collaboration for the Teams of Tomorrow (SHCTT) project, funded through a Microsoft Productivity Research Grant awarded to Mirjam Augstein and Thomas Neumayr in 2019.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Owner/Author.
PY - 2023/4/19
Y1 - 2023/4/19
N2 - Since 2020, worldwide COVID-19-related lockdowns have led to a rapid increase of remote collaboration, particularly in the domain of knowledge work. This has undoubtedly brought challenges (e.g., work-life boundary management, social isolation), but also opportunities. Practices that have proven successful (e.g., through increased task performance, efficiency or satisfaction) are worth retaining in future. In this qualitative empirical study, we analyzed four teams’ (14 participants in total) mandatory remote collaboration over a period of several days to several months during a nationally imposed lockdown. We report results derived from questionnaires, logbooks, group interviews, and meeting recordings. We identify possible factors influencing quality of task outcome as well as subjective aspects like satisfaction, motivation, and team atmosphere. As a basis for our conclusions, we provide a scheme for categorizing effects of remote collaboration based on an exhaustive literature review on pandemic-induced mandatory remote work and collaboration.
AB - Since 2020, worldwide COVID-19-related lockdowns have led to a rapid increase of remote collaboration, particularly in the domain of knowledge work. This has undoubtedly brought challenges (e.g., work-life boundary management, social isolation), but also opportunities. Practices that have proven successful (e.g., through increased task performance, efficiency or satisfaction) are worth retaining in future. In this qualitative empirical study, we analyzed four teams’ (14 participants in total) mandatory remote collaboration over a period of several days to several months during a nationally imposed lockdown. We report results derived from questionnaires, logbooks, group interviews, and meeting recordings. We identify possible factors influencing quality of task outcome as well as subjective aspects like satisfaction, motivation, and team atmosphere. As a basis for our conclusions, we provide a scheme for categorizing effects of remote collaboration based on an exhaustive literature review on pandemic-induced mandatory remote work and collaboration.
KW - mandatory remote collaboration
KW - mandatory remote work
KW - remote collaboration
KW - work from home
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160014914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3544548.3580989
DO - 10.1145/3544548.3580989
M3 - Paper
SP - 1
T2 - CHI '23 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Y2 - 23 April 2023 through 28 April 2023
ER -