Is the Technostress Creators Inventory Still an Up-To-Date Measurement Instrument? Results of a Large-Scale Interview Study

Thomas Fischer, Alexander Pehböck, René Riedl

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/TagungsbandKonferenzbeitragBegutachtung

Abstract

Self-report measures are of great importance for technostress research and particularly the Technostress Creators Inventory has been amongst the most frequently applied measurement instruments since its inception in 2008. As the technological environment has progressed since then, we investigated whether this inventory still completely represents the phenomenon of technostress today. We conducted interviews with 75 individuals in four companies on their technostress experiences. We asked them about their personal experiences with eight stressor categories in the workplace, the original five dimensions of the Technostress Creators Inventory (techno-overload, techno-invasion, techno-complexity, techno-insecurity, and techno-uncertainty) and additional three categories (techno-unreliability, IT-based monitoring, and cyberbullying). We found that techno-insecurity was the least prevalent stressor category throughout all companies, while techno-unreliability, one of our new categories, was the most prevalent stressor. Based on this evidence, we argue that a revised inventory is urgently needed to guarantee content validity of technostress measurement in future studies.
OriginalspracheEnglisch
TitelTagungsband der 14. Internationalen Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik
Seiten1834-1845
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2019
Veranstaltung14. Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik - Siegen, Deutschland
Dauer: 23 Feb. 201927 Feb. 2019
https://wi2019.de/

Konferenz

Konferenz14. Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik
Land/GebietDeutschland
OrtSiegen
Zeitraum23.02.201927.02.2019
Internetadresse

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Is the Technostress Creators Inventory Still an Up-To-Date Measurement Instrument? Results of a Large-Scale Interview Study“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Zitieren