Abstract
Teachers' ( N = 625; 74% female) use of intervention strategies was examined in a hypothetical bullying episode. Self-reported strategies were best described by a five-factor structure. Teachers preferred authority-based interventions, followed by non-punitive work with bullies and involvement of other adults. They were less likely to work with victims or ignore the incident. About 60% of teachers would apply authority-based interventions toward bullies without working with victims at the same time, while 3% would work with victims without using authority-based interventions toward bullies. Strategy use was moderated by teachers' gender and teaching experience. Implications for bullying prevention and teacher education are discussed.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Seiten (von - bis) | 191-202 |
| Seitenumfang | 12 |
| Fachzeitschrift | Teaching and Teacher Education |
| Jahrgang | 51 |
| Ausgabenummer | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 1 Okt. 2015 |
UN SDGs
Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung
-
SDG 16 – Frieden, Gerechtigkeit und starke Institutionen
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „How teachers respond to school bullying: An examination of self-reported intervention strategy use, moderator effects, and concurrent use of multiple strategies“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver