Aktivitäten pro Jahr
Abstract
After service failures (e.g., unfriendly staff), dissatisfied consumers increasingly turn to marketer-created social media platforms – like Facebook brand pages – to voice a public online complaint and to achieve their individual and collective complaint goals (e.g., seeking redress, revenge taking, warning other consumers). This research demonstrates that companies can benefit from segmenting online complainants according to their customer-brand relationship status (i.e., affective brand commitment) and the consumer’s initial desire for revenge to improve online complaint handling (i.e., ‘webcare’).
Cluster analysis applied on multi-national survey data from both Germany and the US (n = 812) reveals that marketers have to deal with three major complainant types: (i) ‘Revengeful loyalists’ (i.e., committed, revengeful customers driven mainly by webcare-independent motives and immune to all forms of service recovery efforts) (63%/60%); (ii) ‘Constructive loyalists’ (i.e., committed, cooperative customers with a deep interest to restore the customer-brand relationship, but high recovery expectations) (19%/25%); and (iii) ‘Constructive unattached customers’ (i.e., webcare-receptive customers having weak relational bonds, but no interest to cause harm) (18%/15%).
This study further shows that the three segments differ in respect to various characteristics pertaining the individual and the failure circumstances (e.g., attribution of blame, emotions, complaint history). Besides profiling these segments, this study shows that webcare responses help to mitigate post-webcare negative word-of-mouth when they match the needs of the segment. Besides theoretical contributions, this research also bears some practical implications like demonstrating that about 80% of online complainants have strong pre-webcare social bonds with the brand. This makes webcare efforts particularly demanding: only (highly) accommodative reactions (e.g., a sincere excuse with an explanation and a redress offer) are likely – if at all – to prevent follow-up NWOM among constructive loyalists. These complainants are originally attached ‘brand lovers’ who grant marketers various opportunities to restore the currently disordered customer-brand relationship. However, they have high expectations towards the brand and towards the online recovery episode.
Cluster analysis applied on multi-national survey data from both Germany and the US (n = 812) reveals that marketers have to deal with three major complainant types: (i) ‘Revengeful loyalists’ (i.e., committed, revengeful customers driven mainly by webcare-independent motives and immune to all forms of service recovery efforts) (63%/60%); (ii) ‘Constructive loyalists’ (i.e., committed, cooperative customers with a deep interest to restore the customer-brand relationship, but high recovery expectations) (19%/25%); and (iii) ‘Constructive unattached customers’ (i.e., webcare-receptive customers having weak relational bonds, but no interest to cause harm) (18%/15%).
This study further shows that the three segments differ in respect to various characteristics pertaining the individual and the failure circumstances (e.g., attribution of blame, emotions, complaint history). Besides profiling these segments, this study shows that webcare responses help to mitigate post-webcare negative word-of-mouth when they match the needs of the segment. Besides theoretical contributions, this research also bears some practical implications like demonstrating that about 80% of online complainants have strong pre-webcare social bonds with the brand. This makes webcare efforts particularly demanding: only (highly) accommodative reactions (e.g., a sincere excuse with an explanation and a redress offer) are likely – if at all – to prevent follow-up NWOM among constructive loyalists. These complainants are originally attached ‘brand lovers’ who grant marketers various opportunities to restore the currently disordered customer-brand relationship. However, they have high expectations towards the brand and towards the online recovery episode.
Originalsprache | Englisch |
---|---|
Titel | AMSWMC 2019: Enlightened Marketing in Challenging Times |
Untertitel | Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science |
Herausgeber (Verlag) | Springer |
Seiten | 81-82 |
Seitenumfang | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 2020 |
Extern publiziert | Ja |
Veranstaltung | 2019 Academy of Marketinc Science (AMS) World Marketing Congress (AMSWMC22) - Edinburgh, Großbritannien/Vereinigtes Königreich Dauer: 9 Juli 2019 → 11 Juli 2019 |
Publikationsreihe
Name | Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science |
---|---|
ISSN (Print) | 2363-6165 |
ISSN (elektronisch) | 2363-6173 |
Konferenz
Konferenz | 2019 Academy of Marketinc Science (AMS) World Marketing Congress (AMSWMC22) |
---|---|
Land/Gebiet | Großbritannien/Vereinigtes Königreich |
Ort | Edinburgh |
Zeitraum | 09.07.2019 → 11.07.2019 |
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „How can Firms Stop Negative Word-of-Mouth? A Typology of Online Complainants: An Abstract“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Aktivitäten
- 1 Vortrag
-
How can firms stop negative word-of-mouth? A typology of online complainants
Weitzl, W. J. (Redner*in), Hutzinger, C. (Redner*in) & Einwiller, S. (Redner*in)
9 Juli 2019 → 11 Juli 2019Aktivität: Gespräch oder Vortrag › Vortrag