TY - JOUR
T1 - Automated vessel edge detection in velocity-encoded cine-MR (VEC-MR) flow measurements
T2 - A retrospective evaluation in critically ill patients
AU - Henk, Christine B.
AU - Grampp, Stephan
AU - Backfrieder, Werner
AU - Liskutin, Jasmin
AU - Czerny, Christian
AU - Mostbeck, Gerhard H.
PY - 2003/12
Y1 - 2003/12
N2 - Objective: To assess feasibility of automated edge detection in magnetic resonance (MR) flow calculations in a clinical setting with critically ill patients. Material and methods: Velocity encoded cine-MR (VEC-MR) flow measurements cross-sectional area (CSA), mean spatial velocity (MSV), instantaneous flow (IF), flow (F), 0.5 T Philips, TR 800-800, TE=8 ms, 30° flip angle, FOV 280 mm, 128×256 matrix, temporal resolution 16 time frames/RR, VENC=120 cm/s) were obtained in 20 major thoracic human vessels (ascending aorta, main, right and left pulmonary artery - AAO, MPA, RPA, LPA) of five patients, suffering from severe chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Flow maps were evaluated by two independent observers using conventional manual edge detection (INTER m/m). Flow calculations were performed by one observer using both, manual and automated edge detection (INTRA m/a), by a second observer using automated edge detection two times (INTRA a/a) and by two independent observers using automated edge detection (INTER a/a). Evaluation time was measured. Linear regression analysis and Student's t-test were performed. Results: Overall regression coefficients (r2) for INTER m/m, INTRA m/a, INTER a/a and INTRA a/a, respectively, were as follows: CSA, 0.91, 0.91, 0.96, 0.98; MSV, 0.97, 0.99, 0.99, 0.99; IF, 0.98, 0.99, 0.99, 0.99; F, 0.98, 0.99, 0.99, 0.99. Manual CSA values differed significantly from automated data in MPA (P=0.01), RPA (P=0.0008) and LPA (P=0.02). No difference was found for the other assessed parameters of the pulmonary circulation. Average evaluation time per vessel was 20.2±2.6 min for manual and 2.1±0.7 min for automated edge detection (P<0.00001). Conclusion: The software program used provided reproducible data, lead to a 90% reduction in evaluation and calculation time and, therefore, might excel the utilization of VEC-MR flow measurements. Despite variations in the evaluation of the pulmonary circulation CSAs, flow assessment is feasible in critically ill patients.
AB - Objective: To assess feasibility of automated edge detection in magnetic resonance (MR) flow calculations in a clinical setting with critically ill patients. Material and methods: Velocity encoded cine-MR (VEC-MR) flow measurements cross-sectional area (CSA), mean spatial velocity (MSV), instantaneous flow (IF), flow (F), 0.5 T Philips, TR 800-800, TE=8 ms, 30° flip angle, FOV 280 mm, 128×256 matrix, temporal resolution 16 time frames/RR, VENC=120 cm/s) were obtained in 20 major thoracic human vessels (ascending aorta, main, right and left pulmonary artery - AAO, MPA, RPA, LPA) of five patients, suffering from severe chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Flow maps were evaluated by two independent observers using conventional manual edge detection (INTER m/m). Flow calculations were performed by one observer using both, manual and automated edge detection (INTRA m/a), by a second observer using automated edge detection two times (INTRA a/a) and by two independent observers using automated edge detection (INTER a/a). Evaluation time was measured. Linear regression analysis and Student's t-test were performed. Results: Overall regression coefficients (r2) for INTER m/m, INTRA m/a, INTER a/a and INTRA a/a, respectively, were as follows: CSA, 0.91, 0.91, 0.96, 0.98; MSV, 0.97, 0.99, 0.99, 0.99; IF, 0.98, 0.99, 0.99, 0.99; F, 0.98, 0.99, 0.99, 0.99. Manual CSA values differed significantly from automated data in MPA (P=0.01), RPA (P=0.0008) and LPA (P=0.02). No difference was found for the other assessed parameters of the pulmonary circulation. Average evaluation time per vessel was 20.2±2.6 min for manual and 2.1±0.7 min for automated edge detection (P<0.00001). Conclusion: The software program used provided reproducible data, lead to a 90% reduction in evaluation and calculation time and, therefore, might excel the utilization of VEC-MR flow measurements. Despite variations in the evaluation of the pulmonary circulation CSAs, flow assessment is feasible in critically ill patients.
KW - Computers
KW - Diagnostic aid
KW - Flow dynamics
KW - Magnetic resonance (MR)
KW - Pulmonary arteries
KW - Vascular studies
KW - Blood Flow Velocity/physiology
KW - Humans
KW - Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Critical Illness
KW - Thoracic Arteries/pathology
KW - Linear Models
KW - Male
KW - Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine/methods
KW - Feasibility Studies
KW - Hypertension, Pulmonary/diagnosis
KW - Female
KW - Retrospective Studies
KW - Chronic Disease
KW - Observer Variation
KW - Pulmonary Circulation/physiology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344063424&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0720-048X(03)00042-1
DO - 10.1016/S0720-048X(03)00042-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 14652146
AN - SCOPUS:0344063424
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 48
SP - 274
EP - 281
JO - European Journal of Radiology
JF - European Journal of Radiology
IS - 3
ER -