TY - JOUR
T1 - 2D- and 3D-based measurements of orbital floor fractures from CT scans
AU - Ploder, Oliver
AU - Klug, Clemens
AU - Backfrieder, Werner
AU - Voracek, Martin
AU - Czerny, Christian
AU - Tschabitscher, Manfred
PY - 2002/6
Y1 - 2002/6
N2 - Objective: Two methods for area and volume calculation of the orbit were evaluated following blow-out fractures of the orbital floor using computed tomography (CT) scans. Material and Methods: Isolated blow-out fractures of the orbital floor in human cadavers were simulated by fracturing the orbital floor and placing a defined volume of silicone within each defect. The area of fracture and the volume of silicone simulating herniated periorbital tissue were evaluated in 16 orbits by the use of a three-dimensional (3D) CT-based software package (Analyze®; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA) and software based on two-dimensional (2D) coronal CT scans. Both methods were compared with direct anatomical measurements and evaluated with Lin's concordance coefficient (ρc). Results: Between-method concordance of area and volume calculation were ρc=0.962, and 0.872 for the 3D-CT-based method, and 0.981 and 0.952 for the 2D-CT method, respectively. The time allocated for measurement was significantly longer for the 3D-CT than for the 2D-CT method (p<0.001). Conclusion: Calculations of blow-out fractures of the orbital floor by 3D-CT and 2D-CT method are accurate for assessing the area of fracture and the volume of herniated tissue. Lesser processing time and simple usage favour the 2D-CT-based calculation method.
AB - Objective: Two methods for area and volume calculation of the orbit were evaluated following blow-out fractures of the orbital floor using computed tomography (CT) scans. Material and Methods: Isolated blow-out fractures of the orbital floor in human cadavers were simulated by fracturing the orbital floor and placing a defined volume of silicone within each defect. The area of fracture and the volume of silicone simulating herniated periorbital tissue were evaluated in 16 orbits by the use of a three-dimensional (3D) CT-based software package (Analyze®; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA) and software based on two-dimensional (2D) coronal CT scans. Both methods were compared with direct anatomical measurements and evaluated with Lin's concordance coefficient (ρc). Results: Between-method concordance of area and volume calculation were ρc=0.962, and 0.872 for the 3D-CT-based method, and 0.981 and 0.952 for the 2D-CT method, respectively. The time allocated for measurement was significantly longer for the 3D-CT than for the 2D-CT method (p<0.001). Conclusion: Calculations of blow-out fractures of the orbital floor by 3D-CT and 2D-CT method are accurate for assessing the area of fracture and the volume of herniated tissue. Lesser processing time and simple usage favour the 2D-CT-based calculation method.
KW - Cadaver
KW - Cephalometry/methods
KW - Hernia/diagnostic imaging
KW - Humans
KW - Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods
KW - Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods
KW - Orbital Diseases/diagnostic imaging
KW - Orbital Fractures/diagnostic imaging
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Software
KW - Statistics as Topic
KW - Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036592502&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1054/jcms.2002.0296
DO - 10.1054/jcms.2002.0296
M3 - Article
C2 - 12220994
AN - SCOPUS:0036592502
SN - 1010-5182
VL - 30
SP - 153
EP - 159
JO - Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 3
ER -